The Recreation Vehicle Industry Association commissioned an Economic Impact Study on the RV industry, released on June 7, 2016. The study found that the RV industry contributes about $49.7 billion in economic output or 0.28 percent of the Gross Domestic Product. Through its production and distribution linkages, the industry impacts firms in 426 of the 440 sectors of the United States economy.
Nationwide, the industry is responsible for 216,170 jobs, both directly and inderectly, creating an economic impact of $37.5 billion. The full study results, along with each individual state and congressional district's economic impact is available on the website by clicking here .
Thu Aug 9, 2018
Author: RV News Staff
A new bill has been introduced in Washington that requires the Department of Defense, rather than Department of Commerce, to investigate and justify whether or not a national security basis exists for new tariffs under Section 232. Such tariffs are used when there is a threat to national security and allow the president wide latitude to implement them. These are the tariffs that President Trump and the Department of Commerce initiated on steel and aluminum earlier this year, RVIA says.
Members of the RV industry met with Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), co-chair of the Senate RV Caucus, on Advocacy Day and expressed concern over the 232 steel and aluminum tariffs and their affect on the RV industry.
“When it comes to national security, we must hold bad actors accountable,” Ernst says. “I support the president’s ability to make trade deals and keep our nation secure, but the Department of Defense must justify the national security basis for new tariffs under Section 232, and we must increase congressional oversight of this process.”
The new legislation would reform Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to better align the statute with its original intent as a powerful trade remedy tool for the president and Congress to respond to genuine threats to national security, RVIA says. This legislation addresses concerns that misuse of Section 232 will harm jobs and the economy and likely result in a loss of this trade remedy tool, either at the hands of a World Trade Organization dispute settlement panel or as the result of other congressional action.
“We must hold countries that violate our trade laws accountable, but we must do so in a way that protects American jobs and strengthens the U.S. economy,” Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) says. "I have repeatedly expressed concerns about the misuse of the Section 232 statute to impose tariffs on automobiles and auto parts, and its impact on Ohio jobs and the U.S. economy as a whole. This bipartisan legislation maintains this trade tool while properly placing the national security designation at the Department of Defense and expanding the role of Congress in the process. As a former USTR, I know that misusing our trade tools not only hurts our exports and our manufacturers, but also our consumers, so I urge my colleagues to support this bipartisan legislation.”
Sen. Doug Jones (D-Alabama) agrees.
“We cannot resolve perceived trade imbalances by accusing our allies of being a threat to our national security," Jones says. "If a trading partner is suspected of undermining our national security, that claim needs to be thoroughly investigated by those with relevant expertise in the Department of Defense. Unfortunately, the current process led by the Department of Commerce has been misused to target important job-creating industries in Alabama like auto manufacturing. I’m proud to introduce this bipartisan legislation with Sen. Portman that will reform the Section 232 process and help to refocus our efforts on punishing bad actors, rather than hurting American manufacturers, workers, and consumers.”